Monday, April 20, 2015

I have concluded...

I have concluded that photojournalism has evolved in many different ways. New technology like the internet, digital cameras, and photoshop has played a part in changing photojournalism. The internet has had a big impact on photojournalism because you can easily upload your photos now and let the wold know what you're covering and why. This has help the news travel fast while using pictures to describe hat's going on. You can use the photos you take on you digital camera and upload them to the internet very quick. Digital cameras have helped change photography and photojournalism because with digital cameras you don't have to use film which make taking pictures quicker and easier. Without digital cameras, to develop a picture you would have to send your film into a developer in a black room. This could take a long time just for a couple photos! And the more you take, the more film you would need. Now with digital cameras, you don't need to worry about that. Photoshop has also changed photography and photojournalism. This is because, with photoshop, you can change/enhance any photo you want to. For photojournalists, using photoshop is a bad thing. This is because photojournalists are always supposed to report on what's happening all around the world, using pictures, and whenever they use photoshop that changes what went on in the picture, so it's almost like lying in a picture. New technology has effected photographers and photojournalists in good and bad ways.

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

My theory about American history is that with every step forward there is always a setback. My theory is connected to my topic of this project: photojournalism because of the war pictures that photojournalists take.  There are always setbacks in photojournalism because of the risks you are taking in getting close to war and taking a picture of it. When you get a great award winning picture, it could change photojournalism history. The set backs are being criticized in taking pictures of harsh and crewel things without doing anything about it.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

How does photojournalism contrast from then to now?

Photojournalists affected the major events because they were the people that had the job of letting citizens of their country know what's happening and why with photos. 

What was photojournalist’s affect on some of the major events that happened?

Photojournalism then compared to now has really evolved. You can tell that it has changed because it has gotten more complex  and more and more people are starting to get into it.
This photo was taken during the Great Depression,  and it really says how many people didn't have jobs. This photo has leading lines, because there's a huge line of people waiting to get something to eat because they're unemployed. This photo is very informing on how the Great Depression affected too many.

How did photojournalism get started/invented?

Photojournalism really started in Germany, in the 1920s.  This is when the first photojournalism magazine was created.  This was a modern newspaper for most, because not only did the reporter tell a story through word, but also through photos. However, in Germany, when Hitler came in power many of these magazines were banned. Photojournalists fled to the US. Soon photojournalism evolved into  photojournalists covering wars. It began become more and more popular. Magazines such as Sports Illustrated, and Life magazine considered photojournalism a must.

How does photojournalism affect the life we live today?

Photojournalism in that time period made an impact on the world we live in today because in that time period, many memorable events happened. These events include: The Great Depression, World War I, and World War II. These events kind of "kicked off" the start of photojournalism because photojournalists cover wars and loss in order to inform people that don't know what's going on. This is important, and an example of this would be World War I when the US didn't want to get involved, and many people didn't know that the war was going on. Sure, there was some journalists that reported  the war, but pictures are the only things that don't lie. And people needed to know what's going on in the wars because it could soon affect them.